Phil and I were married at 5:30 in Palo Alto, in the patio of the Lucie Stern Center, under the clearest of clear skies and in front of 120 of our friends and supporters, after eight weeks of insanely intense preparations and more samples of entrees, white wine, and cupcakes than I can remember.
As I stood in the prep room off to one side of the patio, having just watched my three closest friends walk out through the door to join Kelley, our officiant, and Phil's two brothers and best friend, Brian, I was thinking all the things you'd expect: I thought this is it! and I can't believe this is happening, and also wow, don't let it slip away! I want to experience and remember every second of this! I'd had that last thought a number of times over the weekend, beginning as our guests began to arrive at the barbeque. This is it! Don't miss a second! The time we had prepped for, and anticipated, and shopped and cleaned and rearranged for, was happening. As we'd opened each yes RSVP, and as we'd gone through the emails saying out of towners would be there on Saturday night, we'd marveled again and again at how it was actually happening. We were actually having a wedding. Our friends were actually coming. I know I've been hitting that point a lot in these blog postings, but I still can't get over it. Phil and I have been committed to each other for some time, sure. But, as I've written elsewhere, getting married is different, and a wedding is even different from that. To learn that our loved ones didn't just support us in theory, but that they were actually eager to plunk down the hundreds of dollars necessary to fly out to San Francisco, and pay for a hotel, and take part in this ritual with us was staggering. It was especially staggering because it was all so undeniably sincere and heartfelt. We had none of the family presumption or traditional guilt to rely on to make anyone do this. Everybody who came to our wedding came solely and entirely because they wanted to -- because they really wanted to, because they had made the conscious and joyful choice to join us.
And when I stood in the prep room for that one last moment, by myself, waiting to go out, I felt that and wanted to capture it, and knew I couldn't, and knew that this was one of those moments that is so wonderful and so rare you wish you could just stop time and live in it for, oh, say a year or two to fully experience it, to explore every nook and crevice of it, before moving on. Maybe that's what I'm trying to do here. It was a brief moment, and less than a minute later I heard Kelley say, "let's bring out the grooms," and I saw Phil stepping out across the patio, and I walked out and headed across to meet him, hoping to god my knees weren't shaking.
I had written a lot of references to community into our ceremony, because that is the core of a wedding in my understanding. It's not just an excuse for the couple to exchange vows and for everybody else to get dressed up and swill free Champagne. It's a social contract: the marrying couple is declaring their intention to live as a family in the community, and the community is accepting them into itself, putting its stamp of approval on their union, welcoming them into a new, more advanced stage of existence. That may sound overblown to some readers, but I'll bet not to those who are married. It really is different from just living together, no matter for how long and how committed. The old saying is that marriage is a two-way street, meaning that it requires work and change from both its participants to succeed. But it's more than that, because the larger community has a role, too, and although that role is less active (on a daily basis) than the coming and going of the two-way street, it is no less important. Maybe society (and its stamp of approval) is the pavement on which the two-way street is laid, or something like that. This image is growing strained, it's not up to the task of supporting my point, but I hope you get the idea. In any case, the role of the community, of human society, was a very big deal at our wedding, and Kelley talked about it repeatedly in the ceremony.
Kelley. When Phil suggested asking Kelley to officiate at our wedding, I laughed at first, but then quickly became committed to the idea. Kelley is the founder of TheatreWorks, as I'm sure I've mentioned about 5000 times in these posts. He is the man who originally had the vision for a socially responsible, community-serving theatre company here, at a time when the Peninsula offered no theatre and very little community of any form. There's lots more of both now, in no small part due to Kelley's efforts and the evolution of TheatreWorks. At this point, to those who know him or the company, he is a little larger-than-life, while at the same time he is perhaps the most approachable, soft-spoken, emotionally quiet artistic director on the regional theatre circuit. He is deeply passionate about the importance of things like community, diversity, and the role of art in furthering those things. But when Phil first mentioned him as our officiant, I don't think either of us really thought of it as a viable option -- at that moment, we felt a little uncertain of how our wedding would be perceived, and asking Kelley to officiate over it seemed like the ultimate vote of confidence, like asking the Pope to say grace over dinner so your guests would get the idea that the meal was to be taken seriously.
But the image of Kelley officiating became the most central part of that community blessing idea we were evolving. Many weeks later, after he'd agreed, and after I'd signed him up with the Universal Life Church and had his credentials shipped off, he and Phil and I met down in Palo Alto to talk through the ceremony. I'd sent him a draft of what I'd written, complete with ideas for what he would say, but as I told him, I intended it to be only an outline, not a cast-in-stone script for him to follow. Over coffee, as we talked through each part of what I'd written, Kelley kept asking if we were comfortable with him adding certain elements: could he make mention of the political situation? Could he make jokes? Could he make references to musical theatre, and quote Stephen Sondheim? Well... of course. Or, as Phil said, "if you think you can make it through a Sondheim lyric without losing it, go right ahead." For the record, the lyric Kelley had in mind was from Passion, one of Sondheim's less-beloved works, and from a song called "Loving You", which, ironically enough I once performed in a cabaret show. It goes, "Loving you is not a choice, it's who I am." And he did, in fact, get through it without crying.
So that was our preparation with Kelley. I think I'm rambling as I tell this story, and I'm not sure how to give you a clear picture of what actually happened. But my experience was this: I entered from my side room, passing through the sort of collonade that lines the Stern patio courtyard, and I walked across the grass past my three closest friends in the world while Phil walked toward me from the opposite direction. When we got to our places in front of Kelley, I realized the crowd was clapping, and I looked out at them, fastening on a few individual faces but mostly just feeling everything wash over me. I felt utterly there, not at all rushed or overwhelmed as I've heard other marrying couples complain. But I was also very aware of being there, of trying to get the most out of it, of a certain level of self-consciousness as each moment happened. Kelley spoke some of the words I'd written, and some of his own, speaking about marriage and the great contract we were entering into with each other and with our community. He introduced the first set of readings, and I listened to each witness read the words we'd chosen for them. Some got laughs and some sighs, and each one held its own meaning and created a distinct kind of blessing on us and for that moment. I glanced out at our guests once or twice, always the stage manager and wanting to make sure the audience was enjoying the show. And they were.
Kelley invited Phil, and then me, to say our vows to each other, and the crowd laughed as we pulled out our notes to remember what we wanted to say. I'm still not sure exactly why that's funny. Did they really think that in that moment, with all the other things we'd had to think about, we'd be able to just blithely say these things without any help at all? Did we seem over-practiced or overly administrative because we had notes? I don't know, but I do know that our actual vows, when we said them, were received with wonder and celebration. We were both told how beautiful our words had been, and we certainly felt that about each other's. After each of us spoke, Kelley jumped in again to lead us through a version of the traditional "richer or poorer, better or worse" litany. And then we had the second reading, which was the passage from Velveteen Rabbit that seemed to amaze so many people. Honestly, folks, it's off a website! We didn't even come up with the idea on our own!
And then the rings, and then C Kelly singing. She was standing behind me as I faced Phil, which meant that during the song I ended up sort of half-turning and watching her over my shoulder. I also looked out at the crowd to see what they were thinking, but what I really wanted to do was swing around and stare at Kelley -- we'd had bets, Phil and I, over whether he'd make it through that song without crying, or whether we would. Actually, I didn't think I'd cry. As I've said before, this wasn't the intimate moment for us, it was the heartfelt performance, sort of. No less real, but definitely public and less vulnerable then the moments we'd spent alone in preparation for it. I'd cried a little bit -- we both had -- when we'd first read our vows to each other the night before. But to get back to that musical moment in our ceremony, as it turned out, the person who cried most during C Kelly's singing was C Kelly, herself. She barely made it through the big notes, which is not to say she didn't still sound wonderful. We don't have a recording of her on the CD we created, because we didn't know until too late that she was actually going to be able to do it. But we did include a different recording of the song she sang, since it's not only extremely beautiful (and by one of my personal favorite composing teams), but it's also a perfect statement of how we feel about love and our marriage.
After the song came Kelley's benediction, another short passage of his own devising. I think this was where he talked more about politics, about the historical nature of the event and the day. This may also have been where Sondheim crept in, but I can't swear that I remember for sure. Maybe I'll just post the ceremony, so you can look it up for yourself.
And then, "By the power vested in my by the state of California, I now pronounce that you are married!" And to our guests, something like, "May I present the newly married couple!" And he invited us to kiss each other, and we did, and the crowd cheered. For a couple minutes. There were grins and clapping, and we stood and received it, and grinned ourselves, and it was a weird and wonderful moment. In the pictures from that part, I look like a total goon, laughing and not sure how to take it in, while Phil seems to be gloating over the fact that I'd teared up and he hadn't.
Just as we didn't have a processional, we didn't recess, either. Instead, Kelley invited all our guests up to the front to gather around for a big group picture. They did this, while the minions whisked their chairs away, and we now have a fabulous group portrait of everyone who was there with us. As Phil said when we first discussed this idea, there is something both reassuring and powerful about having such an undeniable record of all our supporters. When the forces of evil break into our home to try to rip our wedding rings off our fingers and destroy our marriage license, we can point to this framed photo and say, "See?! All of them were there! All of them approved this!"
But enough political posturing! Our wedding day did have those overtones, in an entirely quiet, calm, joyful manner. But the political was never our focus. It was an added extra, a free side-benefit of the ways we and our guests were joined in celebration and joy. For that day, no overt thoughts of revolution or political struggle were given any time at all.
The next item on the agenda after the group photo was cocktail hour out in the patio. But the wedding party and families snuck off to the main courtyard of the Lucie Stern to take photos. We did all the usual poses, and a few others, as well, with the backdrop of the gorgeous theatre building behind us and the brick walk and green bushes all around. There are shots of Phil and me dancing and laughing that I absolutely love now, and others of us with our witni and families, and the whole wedding party all together that are simply brilliant. Our photographer, Gina, did a fabulous job of it.
After the photos, everybody else headed back to join in the drinking, but Phil and I stayed to get a couple final shots with Gina, and then showed her the ballroom. And here's the next thing that I really desperately want to get across here but don't know if I can. The ballroom was so beautiful, with all the tables draped in burgundy or khaki, and all the white and glass plates laid out on them, and the centerpiece/antipasto spreads spilling down in their centers. I can't really describe it at all adequately. It all looked so rich and also welcoming. I will admit that, while I'd loved all the choices we'd made about how to structure our reception and dinner, and I knew it was going to be a great party, I hadn't felt as much confidence about it simply looking beautiful. We didn't have the budget to do some of the aesthetic things we'd hoped for: there was no special lighting in the ballroom, and we hadn't done anything to decorate the room, itself, beyond placing a couple arrangements of dried flowers around the fireplaces and bar. The cupcake stand anchored one end with its attendant smaller tables, but then there was a great big open space between it and the dinner tables, and I had been afraid that the whole room would seem echoey and unfilled. But I was wrong. It was astoundingly impressive and homey and comfortable all at the same time. It was bounteous. The deeply-infused colors of all the linens, the stacked tiles and the food that spilled out on them; the scents of parmesan and cured meats and briny olives and garlicky bruschetta topping; the sounds of the final pieces of silverware clinking as they were set down by the table minions, and the sounds from outdoor of conversation and laughter at cocktail hour... rich is the only word. Rich for each sense, and in all senses simultaneously. It was beautiful.
Gina took pictures of us, and of the ballroom, and especially of the cupcake stand Phil had built. That item, let me tell you, looked particularly spectacular, and lorded it over its end of the room. Have I ever described the cupcake stand? You'll remember, from oh-so-many weeks ago, how we learned that all the cupcake bakeries in town wanted to rent us very cheesy, inadequate stands (along with cupcakes wrapped in metallic paper, with ribbons and bows all over) and that we hated them. Phil chopped up a bunch of foam core (the leftovers of old lobby posters from his past two theatres), and we'd sat downstairs together over a couple evenings gluing things together, and then had spent half a day at the fabulous Flax Art Supply choosing rare and beautiful papers to cover it. What we ended up with was a tiered, round stand with three lower levels and three upper ones, the two halves separated by a big glass hurricane lamp we got on clearance at Z Gallery. We filled that glass column with cuttings from the Killer Ivy which is trying to mummify our back deck, and we got a big bunch of purple flowers for the very top, where the central column around which it was all constructed allowed room for a glass or vase. The flowers sprayed out from the top of the stand like a fountain, and finished off the whole thing beautifully. Overall, it was amazing and gorgeous, and a wholly worthy replacement for the traditional wedding cake. Oh yeah-- and it was also covered with more than a hundred mini-cupcakes from Delessio Market (
go there!) here in SF, which is one of the truly great sort of gourmet buffet/bakeries in town. We'd chosen a deep dark chocolate cupcake with white chocolate icing, and also a pumpkin cupcake with some kind of icing I can't remember -- buttercream? Something spicy? Anyway, it was incredible. Toward the end of the night, Phil and I did our version of that annoying feed-each-other-the-first-slice tradition, which went much better with mini-cupcakes than it often does with huge pieces of cake. And no, this did not turn into a food fight, because we are not twenty-year olds playing around at all this.
I'm skipping ahead. Eating the cupcakes didn't come until hours later, after we'd rejoined our guests and our families and witni out in the patio for cocktails, and then helped herd them into the ballroom and sorted them out to their assigned tables for dinner, and eaten, ourselves, and gotten up and visited all the tables like the good hosts we are, and had toasts, and drunk Champagne... but what can I tell you about all that? It all went perfectly. Everybody had a great time. Our apparently unique take on antipasta and dinner went over brilliantly, with each table figuring out on their own how to navigate the overwhelming amount of food they found themselves facing as they sat down. Some picked up the tiles and passed them around, some designated one person to stand and hand things out. Some just took what was closest to them. But they all talked, they all figured out what worked best for them. Our biggest challenge, and our top priority, had been to create an atmosphere where our guests would all break down their own walls of unfamiliarity and get to know each other. And that worked. They were forced to cooperate in a way they really liked. And the food gave them something to talk about, too.
In fact, as I've said a number of times, the entire event was both exactly what we'd hoped for, and yet also much better than we'd expected. All our plans and intentions bore fruit, and they also bloomed and grew beyond what we'd foreseen. We wanted everyone to have a good time, but we hadn't expected that an appreciable number of them, both on the night itself and in the weeks after, would come to us and say that it was the very nicest wedding they'd ever attended. We'd tasted food options for weeks, and made the best choices we could, because we wanted our guests to enjoy a great spread-- but we hadn't expected to be stopped again and again as we talked to them to be asked where this was from and where that was from, where they could get some of those, and if we could demand the recipe from whoever had made the green beans. We'd carefully outlined everything that needed to happen that night, and made sure to hire enough minions to get it all done-- but we hadn't imagined that we would also get workers who were excited to be there, and happy and enthusiastic, and who'd keep congratulating us and just be thrilled for being a part of our wedding.
Who knew? Who could have imagined?
One last thing I'll tell you about, because it seems to have loomed so large in so many people's minds, is our first dance. Phil had insisted that we must dance -- that not only must there be dancing to round out our reception, but that the two of us must do a "first dance" together as a couple. Oh, dear god. Now, those of you who know me also know that I spent 15 years dancing in public, that I made my living that way through my twenties and thirties. But that was in full-fledged production shows, on stage, with a cast of other dancers and singers around me. It was not on a ballroom floor at my own wedding reception, out of context and at a moment when performing was completely beside the point, not to say inappropriate.
But eventually I gave in, and we'd created a very nice collection of five non-threatening waltzes which we thought everyone would enjoy and be able to dance to. We stuck with waltzes because we figured everyone can count to three, and there's an absolute minimum of technique required for this, as opposed to a two-step or a swing or anything else that's less instinctive and common. We'd also talked to a handful of friends whom we knew could dance, and given them strict instructions that they were to grab partners and join in with us after the first verse or so. We did not want to be out there on the dance floor all by ourselves for the entire first number. This was not supposed to be about showing off in front of our guests or making them gawk at us, it was supposed to be about checking off yet another tradition and giving people another way to enjoy themselves. Well, they did, apparently, have a good time, but not by joining in on the dance floor during that first song.
To be absolutely fair, one of our dancing friends, Brian (who was also one of Phil's witni), did grab someone he knew and whirl her out there to keep us company. But for the most part, we were on our own while Leanne Rimes warbled away at
This Love, which is a terrific waltz and a very pretty song. Evidently, Phil and I are just too riveting when we dance together for people to take their eyes off us. I'm saying that facetiously, just in case you think I'm getting insufferably conceited, but there's also, I am forced to admit, some sort of grain of truth to it. We've been told a number of times that there is lots of chemistry when we dance together, and that whether or not we're doing the most complicated or impressive steps together, we are wonderful to watch as we relate to each other. Mostly, I think the point is that we have a good time, and let ourselves go when we dance. Lesbians, in particular, have always seemed to find us wonderful to watch, which we've never understood, but it's always nice to receive their compliments. And our wedding guests seemed to share this fascination, so we were stuck giving a performance after all, which wasn't what I'd signed on for, but oh well -- at least it went over well. We've been promised videos of this dance by a couple people who happened to have video-capable cameras handy, but so far we haven't seen these.
If we could have done anything differently, I would have hired a huge clean-up crew, because as it was, we and our wedding party and our minions had to work very hard to get everything cleaned up and loaded out in the time allotted. This was the part of the evening we had not organized to within an inch of its life beforehand, and that made things more difficult, too, as we didn't ever know precisely what needed to be done at any moment, what anyone else had decided to do about the leftover food or the folding tables or the stack of menus, and at several moments we all seemed to be working at cross-purposes. Still and all, after the van had been reloaded four times, and the cars had all been stuffed full, and we'd said goodbye to all our guests and loved ones, Phil and I drove slowly and carefully off toward Highway 101 feeling utterly exhausted but completely satisfied and amazed that we'd really and truly entered into this new stage in our life.
We got married! We really did it! And it was legal and real and official and a huge joy!
There are a few pictures
here. And there'll be more to talk about, including our honeymoon and the terrible results of this recent election. But for the moment, revel with me in the joy of September 28th, with all our friends around us, joined by our family and community and all our loved ones, sharing in the joy and harmony of a perfect evening, blessed by blue skies and a total dearth of disasters. We had an amazing wedding. Join us in our celebration by remembering and sharing in it with us.